An application gateway, safer than a VPN

A VPN extends the network to the user's device. Coelion extends one application to the user's browser. If a credential or a device is compromised, the attacker accesses only one application. Coelion removes the network exposure that a VPN creates when the workload runs on web applications and the goal is to contain a breach.

The core difference: attack surface

A VPN is a network primitive: after authentication the endpoint sits inside the network and a stolen credential can attempt lateral movement across everything the tunnel reaches. Coelion is an application gateway: every access resolves to one virtual host and module, checked per request against an identity, with no network on the user side of the proxy, so a compromised credential reaches exactly one application and nothing adjacent.

Threat model

With a VPN the reachable surface after compromise is the whole network segment the tunnel exposes; with Coelion it is one application by identity. Lateral movement is possible inside the VPN segment; no network path exists to traverse with Coelion. Attribution with a VPN is reconstructed by correlating concentrator and application logs; Coelion produces a single per-request access log keyed to identity.

What a VPN covers that Coelion does not

Arbitrary protocols, thick-client and desktop apps, offline-tolerant workflows, site-to-site networking, and an existing national-classification accreditation base. Where the workload is a web-delivered application and the priority is containing lateral movement, Coelion is the stronger posture.

Solutions

Platform

Articles

Coelion home